Great, thanks! W dniu niedziela, 8 września 2019 11:57:47 UTC+2 użytkownik ricardo.g.herdt napisał: > > Hi Maciek, > > yes, it is. Take a look at rackjure: > > https://docs.racket-lang.org/rackjure/index.html#(part._dict-app) > > Regards, > > Ricardo > > > Am 08.09.2019 11:51 schrieb Maciek Godek: > > Hi, > > is it possible to take Racket's hash tables and sets, and make them > > applicable (like in Clojure)? > > > > So that, for example > > > > (#hash((a . 1) (b . 2)) 'a) > > > > would be equivalent to > > > > (hash-ref #hash((a . 1) (b . 2)) 'a) > > > > and > > > > ((set 1 2 3) 1) > > > > would be equivalent to > > > > (set-member? (set 1 2 3) 1) > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Racket Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > > send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/879ae299-8f3f-4b9a-b13e-16727f347cb8%40googlegroups.com > > > [1]. > > > > > > Links: > > ------ > > [1] > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/879ae299-8f3f-4b9a-b13e-16727f347cb8%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/c8780d58-ebdf-458b-a3ab-1f93aea109f1%40googlegroups.com.
