Given this macro that I'm experimenting with: (syntax-parse #'(1 2 2 a 2 2 b 2 c) [(1 (~seq n:nat ...+ x) ...) #'((n ... x) ...)])
How would I change it so that it returns #'(2 2 a 2 2 b 2 c) instead of #'((2 2 a) (2 2 b) (2 c)) ? I don't want the parens around the individual sequences that I'm matching, but I haven't figured out a way to do this without using a pattern that forces me to add them in the body of the syntax-parse clause. How can I group the n and x pattern variables in the body without adding parens around them? If could get a syntax class that replaces the (~seq n:nat ...+ x) that might work but I haven't been able to get a syntax class that will do that either. Thanks, Jonathan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/55b38c69-a789-4528-be79-0bf48c97f283%40googlegroups.com.
