If you're just interested in the symbolic name "x", as opposed to the binding identifier, then see `syntax-local-name` or `syntax-local-infer-name`.
If you want the binding identifier, though, that's not available. Matthew At Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:52:23 +0100, Jos Koot wrote: > Hi > > Consider: > (define-syntax (my-syntax stx) blah ...) > (define x (my-syntax blah ...) > > Is it possible for syntax my-syntax such as to know (at expansion time) > that is used as the expr of variable x in the expression of the definition? > Probably this is possible by redefining syntax define, but can I do it > without touching syntax define? > Thanks, Jos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20210227125605.1b1%40sirmail.smtps.cs.utah.edu.
