It is worth noting that it is relatively easy to implement a
define/provide/contract syntax without any problems. In my two most
active projects I use it extensively. In one case even with
scribble/srcdoc to keep the contracts, scribblings and implementation in
one place.

The simplest version:

(define-syntax (define/provide/contract stx)
  (syntax-case stx ()
    ((_ (name args ...)
        contract
        body ...)
     #'(begin
         (provide (contract-out (name contract)))
         (define (name args ...)
           body ...)))))

Of course, this is not the best approach for all situations (and I do
not use it everywhere), but it covers many common use-cases well.


Dominik

On 07. 04. 21 22:34, Robby Findler wrote:
> The short answer: you probably should use (provide (contract-out....))
> instead of define/contract.
> 
> The slightly longer answer: when you write a contract, you are not just
> describing what the legal inputs and outputs are, you are also
> establishing a *boundary* between two regions of code. In the case of
> define/contract, you are establishing a boundary between the function
> (here: f) and the module that it contains (here the file "a.rkt"). In
> the case of (provide (contract-out  ...)) the boundary is between a.rkt
> and b.rkt.
> 
> The slightly uncomfortable answer: it is my (not completely solid yet)
> opinion that the boundary that is drawn for define/contract is perhaps
> not the right / best one. In a theoretical/mathematical sense it is a
> completely fine and completely defensible one. But it trips people up
> sometimes. (There are examples others have posted in the past that are
> perhaps even stranger than yours but boil down to the same specific
> design choice for define/contract.)
> 
> Robby
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:10 PM epi via Racket Users
> <racket-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com>>
> wrote:
> 
>     Hello Racket users,
> 
>     I am trying to understand a contract violation message that I am
>     getting.
>     Here is the file a.rkt:
> 
>         #lang racket
>         (provide f)
>         (define/contract (f a)
>           (-> boolean? any/c)
>           '())
> 
>     and this is b.rkt:
> 
>         #lang racket
>         (require "a.rkt")
>         (f 3)
> 
> 
>     I would expect that the caller is blamed for the contract violation,
>     but the error message that I get is as follows:
> 
> 
>     f: contract violation
>       expected: boolean?
>       given: 3
>       in: the 1st argument of
>           (-> boolean? any/c)
>       contract from: (function f)
>       blaming: /home/epi/snippets/a.rkt
>        (assuming the contract is correct)
>       at: /home/epi/snippets/a.rkt:3.18
>       context...:
>      
>      /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/blame.rkt:347:0:
>     raise-blame-error
>      
>      
> /usr/share/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/arrow-higher-order.rkt:379:33
>        body of "/home/dan/snippets/blameme.rkt"
> 
>     So, I am a bit surprised that the error message blames the file a.rkt.
>     What am I missing here?
> 
>     -- 
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>     Groups "Racket Users" group.
>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>     send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>     <mailto:racket-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
>     To view this discussion on the web visit
>     
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/149cfc632cd666ff1a92177dce90296b%40disroot.org
>     
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/149cfc632cd666ff1a92177dce90296b%40disroot.org>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAL3TdONLMx%3Dy_cgfDsY_k9L9yaX_touO52phiK9scziW_jGrOA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAL3TdONLMx%3Dy_cgfDsY_k9L9yaX_touO52phiK9scziW_jGrOA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/8208bf07-8a32-f0fa-a933-c6b3c4f15fef%40trustica.cz.

Reply via email to