Yes, this is an expected difference. The Racket documentation still only promises `eq?` for characters with scalar values in the range 0 to 255, but Chez Scheme characters are always `eq?` when they are `eqv?`.
At Thu, 20 May 2021 19:17:04 -0400, Stephen Chang wrote: > Hi everyone, Has eq? behavior changed with Racket CS? (ie, 8.0+) > > Specifically: > > $ racket79/bin/racket > Welcome to Racket v7.9 [bc]. > > (eq? (integer->char 955) (integer->char 955)) > #f > > $ plt/racket/bin/racket > Welcome to Racket v8.1.0.6 [cs]. > > (eq? (integer->char 955) (integer->char 955)) > #t > > Is this expected behavior? > > (I know this has probably been addressed and I wasn't paying > attention, but I did a quick search of the list and docs and couldnt > find anything, so just want to double check. Thanks!) > > Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email > to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAFfiA1LQw_ECHrgRN%3DfrK9H%2BE8kS > FFEqdShqSdvXXmfCmcB0Eg%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20210520172844.159%40sirmail.smtps.cs.utah.edu.
