Thank you very much for the information provided! We have a lot to 
experiment with.
Regards,
Mallku

El martes, 26 de octubre de 2021 a las 18:40:49 UTC-3, Robby Findler 
escribió:

> The only way to do that currently is to use the compound rewriters (they 
> rewrite anything with parens) and the atomic rewriters (they rewrite 
> anything without parens). The interface that redex provides is pretty 
> low-level and I'd like to find time to improve it, but in the meantime 
> there are some libraries on the package server that build higher-level ways 
> to do this. 
>
> There's an example of with-compound-rewriter here: 
> https://docs.racket-lang.org/redex/reference.html#%28form._%28%28lib._redex%2Fpict..rkt%29._with-compound-rewriter%29%29
>  
> and redex doesn't care if the thing it is rewriting is defined as a 
> judgment form or as the syntax of a term; it'll apply the rewriter in 
> either case.
>
> As for what Redex generates, it isn't generating latex, it is generating 
> picts (which basically boils down to postscript-style drawing commands when 
> you think about them from the perspective of interoperating with other 
> tools -- one nice thing to do is to use scribble (which generates latex) as 
> it has handling to make them look nice in the rendered output, although 
> getting the right fonts set up can sometimes be tricky).
>
> hth,
> Robby
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 1:55 PM Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi community!,
>> a colleague of mine is trying to typeset a grammar from a model in Redex,
>> using redex/pict. So far, he has obtained a nice-looking typesetting of
>> the productions, but with the inconvenience that they are not abstract. In
>> particular, there are parentheses around every list of symbols,
>> as in Redex. Since it seems that redex/pict does not generate the latex 
>> code
>> (or does it?), we are not able to get rid of those concrete-syntax 
>> details. Is 
>> there any known/simple way of doing it?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!,
>> Mallku
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Racket Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/3c6330fe-a048-4561-98bf-495c9b92e06an%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/3c6330fe-a048-4561-98bf-495c9b92e06an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/f405ba3e-559d-43f5-9df6-2b061c9277d0n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to