To add, since I forgot about the spammer: By "leaving the list to die 
inactive," I am assuming that the list would not be co-opted and would still 
function just fine as an archive. But I would love to keep the option, even if 
I only have a small few people to talk to.

On 11/22/21 11:40 AM, Sage Gerard wrote:

> Since I missed the hallway I'll settle with a belated comment.
>
> Over my lifetime I have accumulated hundreds of accounts. Breaches led to 
> incessant spamming. Thankfully I've kept my passwords varied and strong, so 
> the damage hasn't terrible to contain. I tried to delete accounts to manage 
> my risk, only to learn just how hard it is to do that as a U.S. citizen. In 
> the case of Google, I already had a Google account so I didn't figure the 
> mailing list would worsen my situation much.
>
> Point is, I do due diligence now. Adding an account means another legal 
> agreement, another privacy policy, another social structure, and another 
> increase in my personal attack surface. I know maintaining a mailing list is 
> a PITA regardless of its usefulness, so I totally understand moving to 
> Discourse. I just don't understand this habit of "we're doing this, we want 
> you to do it too" with sunsetting overtones. 1) it sounds like I'm doing 
> someone a favor, and 2) this sounds like when someone first said "Racket2", 
> and I should probably get the fuck outta here before someone throws something.
>
> I know I'm being dramatic, but please consider just leaving the list to die 
> inactive if that is to be its fate. The messaging I'm seeing keeps messing 
> with the community messaging about backwards compatibility, and it's super 
> confusing.
>
> On 11/22/21 10:24 AM, Martin Weigele wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, 22. November 2021, 16:16:35 CET schrieb Jens Axel Søgaard:
>>
>>> There are no plans of closing the mailing list.
>>>
>>> Things take time.
>>>
>>> Different forums for communication have different strengths.
>>
>> Exactly
>>
>>> Discourse might attract an audience that is unfamiliar to mailing lists.
>>> There is no need to rush things however.
>>> In due course maybe the number of users on the forum will
>>> grow to outshadow the number of participants on the mailing list,
>>> but it will take some years.
>>
>> A discourse type forum - we had this discussions in other contexts again and
>> again - may be a better choice for persons who have the luxury they can
>> concentrate on very few thingies. For all others, mailinglists are a much
>> better choice, you can follow many developments in one place: your mail
>> client, with a completely standard UI.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Martin
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Racket Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to
>> [email protected]
>> .
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/2080281.KiezcSG77Q%40castor
>> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/b9684624-d477-ddf1-d434-b34aa9cc89e9%40sagegerard.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/b9684624-d477-ddf1-d434-b34aa9cc89e9%40sagegerard.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/e3661078-68de-2e59-8485-ff7b8be47722%40sagegerard.com.

Reply via email to