I think that might be it specifically about redex, I am sorry to say. Robby
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 5:28 PM Mallku Ernesto Soldevila Raffa < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi community!, > I'm interested in understanding the semantics of PLT Redex, since we are > working on a tool > to translate fragments of Redex models to Coq. At the moment, we just have > a > mechanization in Coq of the semantics proposed in a ~10 years old paper > [1]. Does > anybody know if there is an updated work on formal semantics of Redex? > > Thanks in advance!, > Mallku > > [1] : https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-25318-8_27 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/d794dd4d-34c7-4de8-a4cd-a437dfcc630cn%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/d794dd4d-34c7-4de8-a4cd-a437dfcc630cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAL3TdOMcaBdpksLf2u4o-sw1EW2%3DpYTMgnNaCdaHR_K5uev4cA%40mail.gmail.com.
