On Sat, 3 Sept 2022 at 19:10, Shu-Hung You <[email protected]> wrote:
> Running `racket foo.asm` will produce the desired output, so a shell > script that directly passes the arguments to Racket could work. > Otherwise, just use (dynamic-require filename #f) in main.rkt. > Thanks for helping! Don't both of these methods require a #lang line in the input file? That's not part of the assembly format, so I want to be able to specify the language in the main module. Indeed, when I try it with a file with a #lang line, dynamic-require works; when I remove that line, I get an error about a missing module declaration (no surprise). I can see an obvious workaround, namely to slurp the file and prepend a module declaration before dynamic-requiring it, but that's ugly. So it seems that in fact what I want is to call something like dynamic-require with a module object. But I'm not sure what to call or how to get one of those: read-syntax returns a syntax object, not a module, while I don't (yet) know how to apply my expander's #%module-begin to it to obtain a module. At the technical level, foo.asm is in fact an ordinary Racket module, > just like any other .rkt file. Therefore it can be run in the same way > using APIs that require and instantiate modules. > Right! That's what I've obviously not fully understood yet. (Thanks for the side node about moving to Discourse—it's a while since I've been active on the list!) -- https://rrt.sc3d.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAOnWdojngwzQRGz0dj1QpA4OJixOKGMXGLrepdae08D8dhpJfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
