Can you send mails in a more verbose way?

RTFM-like messages are not really helpful. Next time make some tests and
provide an example or patch. pstruct and so are designed to work from
.S sources, not binaries directly. It's not useful afaik.

--pancake

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:24:17 +0200
"Lluís Batlle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ? :)
> 
> 2007/4/8, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > $ virik -vvv --restart
> >
> > > 2007/4/2, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> > Here I state my problem: I have core dumps of binaries (without
> > >> > symbols, -O2) in a special _undesired_ state (segfault, assertion
> > >> > failed, etc.). I need to know the function parameters and the values
> > >> > in structs.
> > >>
> > >> Umf. without symbols and -O2 hardly damages the "readibility" of a
> > >> program,
> > >> so, all the info of these structs are defined by DWARF. (not supported
> > >> by
> > >> radare), but as xscript told me one time, DWARF sux, and it's hard to
> > >> implement, and the current GNU implementation is full of bugs, but it
> > >> works(R).
> > > man pstruct
> > > :)
> > > (in the case you have perl ;)
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > radare mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.nopcode.org/mailman/listinfo/radare
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > radare mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.nopcode.org/mailman/listinfo/radare
> >
> _______________________________________________
> radare mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nopcode.org/mailman/listinfo/radare
> 


  --pancake
_______________________________________________
radare mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nopcode.org/mailman/listinfo/radare

Reply via email to