Good! Hope no portability issues appear. On 02/03/2011, at 1:01, Glyn Kennington <[email protected]> wrote:
> pancake wrote: >> About the libm dependency. Do you think that feature (using log2) deserves >> to add another dep? I would prefer to keep it simple. The current algo is >> useful in most of cases. > > I think the feature can be added in libr_hash instead, which already > uses <math.h>/libm, so no extra dependencies are needed. Patch coming > when I have time to try out a few different methods and look at code > duplication vs performance. > > Glyn > _______________________________________________ > radare mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org > _______________________________________________ radare mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org
