Very strange, I'll grant you.  If you turn off super-sampling (-as 0) or 
increase -ad to 3000, the artifact mostly disappears.  My suspicion is that the 
method by which the ambient calc estimates errors to decide where to send its 
super-samples has some regularities due to the hemispherical subdivision I use. 
 Near the inside corners, the visible hemisphere is split into two regions, one 
of which is much brighter than the other.  Moving a small amount left or right 
causes a large number of divisions to cross over the threshold, which shifts 
the super-samples and therefore the bias in the calculation.

This bug falls under the category of general shortcomings of the strategies 
used in ambient sampling, which I hope to largely replace with the Hessian 
calculation I mentioned in an earlier post.

Cheers,
-Greg

> From: Mark Stock <mst...@umich.edu>
> Date: September 3, 2013 7:46:43 PM PDT
> 
> Folks,
> 
> In experimenting with the Turrell piece "Afrum I (White)" I found what
> seems to be a bug in the interpolation procedure that becomes notable
> for -aa 0.
> 
> Image: http://markjstock.org/transfer/img12.png
> Files: http://markjstock.org/transfer/afrum1.tar
> 
> This is with HEAD from today. See the HOWTO file for command-line.
> 
> Mark

_______________________________________________
Radiance-dev mailing list
Radiance-dev@radiance-online.org
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev

Reply via email to