The hard_breaks bug is even worse than this, I think. When you turn on hard_breaks it totally ignores all block specifiers except the first one (http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/redcloth-upwards/2006-June/000049.html). When hard_breaks is on this:
p. 703.289.3820 *tel* 703.359.0952 *fax* p. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]":mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Becomes: <p>703.289.3820 <strong>tel</strong><br />703.359.0952 <strong>fax</strong><br /> p. <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a></p> This happens with hn. marks and everything (yikes!). Downgrading RedCloth to 3.0.3 seems to fix it, and with hard_breaks you get: <p>703.289.3820 <strong>tel</strong><br />703.359.0952 <strong>fax</strong></p> <p><a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a></p> I haven't tried downgrading RedCloth with Radiant, but as far as I can tell it should work??? The 0.5.2 gem spec depends on RedCloth >= 3.0.3. I for one would rather not insert <br/> tags all over my mark up. If I was gonna do that I'd just do everything in straight HTML. I like the simplicity of Textile. Paul > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:59:05 +0200 > From: Keith Bingman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Radiant] Redcloth > To: radiant@lists.radiantcms.org > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > John W. Long wrote: >> Keith Bingman wrote: >>> Does that make sense? >> >> So to clarify, you give it the following: >> >> MI 31.08. digi lounging >> DO 01.09. rive gauche opening party >> FR 02.09. csaba, crying soul production >> SA 03.09. l'un est l'autre, deep'n sexy house >> >> And expect: >> >> <p>MI 31.08. digi lounging<br/> >> DO 01.09. rive gauche opening party<br/> >> FR 02.09. csaba, crying soul production<br/> >> SA 03.09. l'un est l'autre, deep'n sexy house</p> >> >> But instead get: >> >> <p>MI 31.08. digi lounging >> DO 01.09. rive gauche opening party >> FR 02.09. csaba, crying soul production >> SA 03.09. l'un est l'autre, deep'n sexy house </p> >> >> ? >> >> -- >> John Long >> http://wiseheartdesign.com > > Yes, this is how it usually works in Textile, at least in Textpattern. > As Dean Allen wrote both, one would expect that that is the way it was > inteneded to work. > > _why seems to have other feelings, but this is how it would ideally work > for me. > > > Keith Bingman > > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Radiant@lists.radiantcms.org http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
