That was my main concern... I'd like to continue packaging the library
with Radiant, but it is no longer pure-Ruby and must be compiled. That
said, RubyGems has greatly improved since we started down this road.
Sean
Jim Gay wrote:
It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting.
John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a
better Markdown parser).
http://github.com/johnmuhl/radiant/tree/markdown
On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Chris Parrish wrote:
I'm fine with it. Looks like a good improvement too.
Now all we need is a better Markdown parser.
-Chris
Sean Cribbs wrote:
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the
latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)?
Sean
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Have you seen this announcement?
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4-released-962.html
Apart from dropping of Markdown support (does radiant use it?), it
could be interesting to update it.
Jim Gay
http://www.saturnflyer.com
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
