Great, thanks for the feedback, that's most helpful. A couple of further questions if it's not too much trouble:
- Will upgrading from .8 to .9 be straightforward? - When you say 'soon' do you have a time-frame in mind or do you mean 'as soon as possible'? Cheers, Charles On 16 March 2010 14:51, Jim Gay <j...@saturnflyer.com> wrote: > I'd agree with that. But I do want to get 0.9 out soon. > I want to squash as many of the issues on github as possible and merge in the > i18n work. > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:45 AM, john muhl wrote: > >> if you want to use 0.9 i'd recommend using the current master branch >> as the RC1 release is far, far behind the current work. personally i'm >> still starting new projects with 0.8.1 mostly because these are sites >> for clients and being profitable means i don't want to be tracking a >> moving target; not because 0.9 is unstable or anything. >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles Roper >> <reac...@charlesroper.co.uk> wrote: >>> I'm about to start a new Radiant site and was wondering whether I should >>> go with 0.9RC1 or 0.8.1? In the opinion of the community, is RC1 stable >>> enough for production use? > _______________________________________________ > Radiant mailing list > Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ > List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant > Radiant: http://radiantcms.org > Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org > _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ List Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant Radiant: http://radiantcms.org Extensions: http://ext.radiantcms.org
