I am on 0.9.1 and this works perfect for me:
<r:if_url matches='^/articles/\S+'>
<r:article_title />
</r:if_url>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Wes Gamble <we...@att.net> wrote:
> I would try escaping the '/' character, like so:
>
> <r:if_url matches="^\/contact">
>
> Wes
>
>
> On 2/21/11 8:12 PM, craayzie wrote:
>
> Interesting .. will give this a shot but just FYI - I'm using if_url
> in the HEAD section of the layout.
>
> I'm still curious why it's not matching. I think that's the real
> question.
>
> And I completely failed to mention that I'm trying to do this in a
> layout. Does the <r:if_url> tag work within layouts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Feb 21, 4:46 pm, Anton J Aylward <radi...@antonaylward.com>
> <radi...@antonaylward.com> wrote:
>
> craayzie said the following on 02/21/2011 07:22 PM:
> .
>
>
> I'm trying to use if_url to conditionally include jquery on my /
> contact page but it doesn't seem to be working:
>
> <r:if_url matches="^/contact">
> <script type="text/javascript"
> src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.0/jquery.min.js";
> <http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.0/jquery.min.js>>
> </script>
> </r:if_url>
>
> Any ideas what I might be doing wrong?
>
> I don't know about "doing wrong"
> but I have something that works.
>
> In my layout I have this
>
> <head>
> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
> .....
> <r:if_content part="head">
> <r:content part="head" />
> </r:if_content>
> ....
> </head>
>
> Why do I do this?
>
> I'm one of those obsessive people who think that script and css belong
> in the <HEAD> and not in the <BODY>
> This lets me set up a page part which means that if any page needs
> special JS or CSS is can have it ... in the <HEAD>
>
> Now if you were to add in there
>
> inherit="true"
>
> you could put a page-part "head" in the "/contact"
> with the JS and it would apply to everything below it.
>
> which is what you are trying to achieve.
>
> And it would not appear in any other pages.
> No need for the <r:if_ur>
>
> You've localised the scope of the impact and made it much more general,
> something that can be applied and expanded later without the need to
> revise your layout.
>
> As for the syntax of your <script> .....
> Dunno. But now, sicne its in the head, it should work sicne it looks
> like all the JS I have in my <HEAD> sections
>
> --
> Experience teaches only the teachable.
> Aldous Huxley (1894 - 1963)
>
>
