Wow. Thanks so much for putting this together.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug <jfahrenk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > I have created both a 0.8.1 and 0.9.1 demo project that showcases the > significant performance decline: > https://github.com/jfahrenkrug/Radiant-Performance-Decline > > Rendering 460k of plain text with Radiant 0.8.1 takes 32ms. Rendering > the same text with Radiant 0.9.1 takes 9400ms(!!!). > > I hope this project helps you to find the bottleneck. > > Thanks and cheers, > > Johannes > > On Jul 7, 12:11 pm, Johannes Fahrenkrug <jfahrenk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> thanks for your reply. It's a client project, so I have to see what >> information I can give out. I have the feeling Radius got slower. >> >> I'll report back. >> >> - Johannes >> >> On Jul 5, 3:27 pm, Jim Gay <j...@saturnflyer.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I've not seen this. Can you post some stats and some code to help figure >> > it out? >> >> > Perhaps there were changes that only affect performance in a situation >> > like that of your site (however it is setup) and we're finding the >> > edge. >> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Johannes Fahrenkrug >> >> > <jfahrenk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Hi, >> >> > > we have a big site running on Radiant 0.8.2. Internally we're moving >> > > the site to Radiant 0.9.1. That worked nicely, but most pages need >> > > about 1 sec (!) longer to render. Most pages have lots of parts and >> > > snippets. >> >> > > Are there any known changes from 0.8 to 0.9 that would explain this >> > > performance impact? >> >> > > Thanks and cheers, >> >> > > Johannes >> >> > -- >> > Jim Gay >> > Saturn Flyer LLChttp://www.saturnflyer.com >> > 571-403-0338 > -- Jim Gay Saturn Flyer LLC http://www.saturnflyer.com 571-403-0338
