Actually, the RFC explicitly says that the server should not respond to
packets with a duplicate identifier.
Cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants +61 3 9598 0985
Mike is travelling right now, and there may be delays
in our correspondence.
-----Original Message-----
From: tom minchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arnie Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, April 08, 1999 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) problem with Radiator duplicate detection
>On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 10:09:28AM +0100, Arnie Roberts wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 07, 1999 3:13 AM, tom minchin
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>>
>> > * yes it's bad the packet is being lost, but RADIUS should recover from
that.
>>
>> How??
>> RADIUS runs over UDP. Surely this is a problem with RADIUS not Radiator.
>>
>
>Radiator is detecting the repeated Access-Request as a duplicate and
ignoring
>it. It should, according to RADIUS, resend the Access-Accept to the NAS not
>discard it as obviously the NAS didn't get the first one as it's stilling
>asking.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>===
>To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
>'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
>
===
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
