Hi Tom -
On Tue, 01 Feb 2000, tom minchin wrote:
> Hi,
> This is not a Radiator question per se, has anyone experienced this
> gruesome 'bug' with Cisco?
>
> Tue Feb 1 00:30:00 2000: DEBUG: Packet dump:
> *** Received from 203.23.1.184 port 1645 ....
> Code: Access-Request
> Identifier: 114
> Authentic: O<172><172><178><4><158><129><220><160><232>$=<135>v<173>-
> Attributes:
> NAS-IP-Address = 203.23.1.183
>
> I'm pretty sure that Radiator would not be messing with the
> NAS-IP-Address, as it's only a couple of the NAS'es which are affected
> and they all reduce by one (ie 184 says it's 183).
>
Radiator just reports what is in the packet - looks like a bug to me (unless
you have that address configured on some other port and that is what is being
used for the radius requests).
regards
Hugh
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8,
NT, Rhapsody
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
