Not really, aside from the standard authentication scheme, our
Authentication requirements includes:
1. Caller-Id blocking
2. Roaming Restriction on 7 POPs (can be combination of any or all
including GRIC's)
3. Dedicated-Dialup (dynamic Check and Reply items) which i don't know
why Portal can't support without lengthy customization.
4. Prepaid accounts that is not included in the Infranet migration.
those are the problems they've been trying to address, including the
fact that i'm tagged packets using "Class" attributes to help make their
customization easier.
lastly, we don't keep cleartext passwords. we encrypted our passwords
via UNIX crypt() with random salt. for some funny reasons, Infranet can
not take those encrypted *already* passwords. they need to use the
first tww (2) characters of the cleartext password as the salt.
Hugh, what distribution do you need? i hope not the entire Infranet.
":>
ps. POID here, POID there!
Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> You must have a more complicated configuration requirement than us. We're
> able to proxy everything (authentication and accounting) through to TSM.
>
> Andrew
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Darwin A. Bawasanta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 4:19 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Andrew Pollock; David Lloyd
> > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Radiator and Infranet
> >
> >
> > hmmm... will there be any AuthBy Portal or sumthin in the future?
> >
> > i don't wish to give up Radiator in place of their TSM so i end up
> > forwarding just the accounting packets to their TSM for the moment. i'm
> > trying so hard to keep both database in sync, which is temporary until i
> > get the Portal guys to customize their TSM and inherit the
> > functionalities (*hard stuff* as andrew would describe) i'm currently
> > enjoying with Radiator.
> >
> > Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > > > Behalf Of David Lloyd
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:51 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: (RADIATOR) Radiator and Infranet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone ever gotten Radiator to work with Infranet in leu of their
> > > > pathetic Radius server?
> > > >
> > > > If so, did you write your own AuthBy module for Infranet?
> > Did it take a
> > > > long time?
> > > >
> > > > Any replies are most appreciated... thanks!
> > >
> > > Heh, I'm going to write my own AuthBy module one of these days...
> > > We just put Radiator in front of TSM and proxy everything
> > through to it. All
> > > the hard stuff is done in Radiator, and TSM just does the final
> > > authentication. With creative use of inserting the Class
> > attribute you can
> > > "tag" specific packets with Radiator for different
> > authentication in TSM.
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > ===
> > > Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
> > > Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
> > > 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
> >
> > --
> > __
> > OO- `. Darwin A. Bawasanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp-id: 0x367CADAC
> > * ||| Systems Development Manager SKYCablenet, Inc.
> > L_(_/ Ofc: +63 32 253-6677 Mobile: +63 917 486-5033
> > |||==
> > ((_| "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts."
> >
--
__
OO- `. Darwin A. Bawasanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp-id: 0x367CADAC
* ||| Systems Development Manager SKYCablenet, Inc.
L_(_/ Ofc: +63 32 253-6677 Mobile: +63 917 486-5033
|||==
((_| "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts."
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
