Hi all,
when it is defined a pool, and it is used a 'subnetmask' different
than '255.255.255.255', i think the ip addresses should not be
assigned one by one, but 'n' by 'n', where 'n' was the number of ip
addresses indicated by 'subnetmask'.
an example:
<AddressPool pool1>
Range 192.168.7.1 192.168.7.128
Subnetmask 255.255.255.248
</AddressPool>
first user should get 192.168.7.1/29, second 192.168.7.9/29, and so
on.
currently, first user get 192.168.7.1/29, but second one get
192.168.7.2/29, so, there are two networks overlapped.
there is a solution for that? do you have understanded my question?
thank you.
Jesus M Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Telia Iberia, S.A.
Planificación y Diseño de Red
Tfno: +34 91 623 2909
Fax: +34 91 623 2911
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
