RE: (RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request

[Dave Kitabjian]

Title: Message

If that's truly all it does in this scenario, I would think that we can get rid of the AuthBy and replace it with:

 

    AccountingHandled

   

    http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ref.html#pgfId=363868

 

Am I right?

 

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Trout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Dave Kitabjian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request

I believe you still need something to return a packet to register the logging; we just use an AuthBy TEST clause to do so. There may be a cleaner way to do this (since TEST generates a line in the logfile every time); if there is, would someone care to enlighten me?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Kitabjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: (RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request
>
>
> Given the following:
>
>       <Handler Request-Type = Accounting-Request>
>        
>               ...
>
>             AuthBy  LDAP_SERVER_1
>
>       </Handler>
>
> am I correct in assuming that the AuthBy specifier would be completely
> ignored and irrelevant since no Access-Requests will ever be handled
> here?
>
> Dave
> ===
> Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
> Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
> 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
>