On 06/06/2012 07:17 PM, David Heinz wrote:

> I was wondering if the following "issue" also occurs in the Radiator code. 
> 
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85648.msg943612
> 
> I've looked at the code, and I see if it doesn't decrypt properly then
> there is obviously a reject. This is then followed by a REJECT if the
> CRC is not ok. However, I see no method to verify the "secret id" as
> mentioned in the post. Is radiator using the same method for Yubikey
> authentication as the Yubico systems then?
> 
> Thanks for any info you can give. I need to make sure I understand this
> so I can talk to our Information Security team.

Thanks for letting us know of this issue. I heard this will be looked at
soon, so expect an update in the near future.

Thanks again!
Heikki


-- 
Heikki Vatiainen <h...@open.com.au>

Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS,
TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP,
DIAMETER etc. Full source on Unix, Windows, MacOSX, Solaris, VMS,
NetWare etc.
_______________________________________________
radiator mailing list
radiator@open.com.au
http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

Reply via email to