Heikki,

On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Heikki Vatiainen <h...@open.com.au> wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 07:56 PM, Mueller, Jason C wrote:
> 
>> I have currently relented to specifying every individual IP address
>> that needs to listen for RADIUS across the set of systems running
>> Radiator (both v4 and v6), and I will just live with the binding
>> errors when Radiator starts. The reason is that the Radiator config
>> is managed in a single file that is pushed to multiple systems to
>> ensure consistency of the config.
> 
> You could consider creating using 'Included %D/bindaddress.cfg' and
> having a separate bindaddress.cfg on each host. The file would have just
> the BindAddress option with the addresses that the host has.
> 
> This would allow you to keep the main config in a single file and get
> rid of the startup errors.

That is an interesting idea. I will think about it. My only hesitation is that 
there is still a difference between the servers that needs to be managed. I 
might just stick with the errors for now, but this is a possibility.


>> Is there any plan for IPv6 CIDR support in the future? If so, what 
>> timeframe?
> 
> Thanks for clarifying your situation. There is no specific timeframe set
> yet. However, do you think you could help testing this when we think
> IPv6 CIDR support is ready for wider testing?

Absolutely. I would be happy to help test.

-Jason


_______________________________________________
radiator mailing list
radiator@open.com.au
http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator

Reply via email to