On 22.1.2016 1.22, Barry Ard wrote: > We have recently migrated our RADIUS wireless infrastructure to use our > F5 load balancers. We have effectively moved from 2 big iron radius > servers with many radiator processes to 15 VMs and 2 redundant F5s doing > the proxying. It has been working very well since Christmas. What I > haven't figured out is how to include our Eduroam configs. Do we have to > get away from our NATed f5 config and go to routed? > > Any direction would be greatly appreciated.
I thought I'd check if you have received any answers on this. I don't have any specific advice, but maybe you could describe what/how the eduroam config is problematic with the NATed configuration. Are the eduroam root servers expecting to see Radiator server addresses directly instead of F5 IPs? Thanks, Heikki -- Heikki Vatiainen <h...@open.com.au> Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald, Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS, TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP, DIAMETER etc. Full source on Unix, Windows, MacOSX, Solaris, VMS, NetWare etc. _______________________________________________ radiator mailing list radiator@open.com.au http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
