Not that I'm aware of.
You'll need some parse/transform pass for PCRE to ragel. I'm no expert
on PCRE syntax, so I can't really comment on how difficult it will be.
I can say PCRE and ragel use different implementation techniques though,
so you may run into some road blocks on those grounds. Ragel is pure
DFA, while PCRE uses some mix of DFA and an interpretor that backtracks.
-Adrian
On 13-03-19 08:20 AM, Ellis Breen wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a semantic element, preprocessor or component that will allow
me to express standard PCREs in Ragel?
I'm not trying to implement a regex engine, but to find the intersection
of two PCRE search patterns. I believe I've managed to do this by
manually rewriting PCREs into Ragel format, but I'd like to automate the
process, as I have a large number of PCREs to compare.
Any hints on how I can do this with Ragel, or an alternative?
This appears to be about the closest I've found to what I need.
Many thanks,
Ellis
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users@complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users@complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
