On Monday, 21 October 2013 17:17:57 CEST, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
The following modification in the grammar fixes it:
( 0x01..0x09 | 0x0B..0x0C | 0x0E..0x7F | 0x80..0xFF)+;
but I don't understand wht it is required to split the last range into
two ranges.
Seems like ragel treats this as a signed char, i.e. -128..127. Your code
appears to be a nice and portable workaround.
I've hit a "similar" problem recently -- the issue was a signedness of a
char, but in a different context. I don't think it applies, but the patch
is at [1] anyway.
Cheers,
Jan
[1]
http://repo.or.cz/w/ragel-jkt.git/commitdiff/dc238e78cd3024889b6fb2618fe5bbc20179a132
--
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users@complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
