Yes. /opt/local/bin/ruby I know it sounds stupid that it should segfault against 1.8.7 when installed with ruby 1.9.1'gem' I hope that it isn't something like the gem using a guess on mac as to 'site_ruby' and macports is being circumvented. Anecdotal evidence from others using ruby 1.9.1 is that it's only me...
I'm reinstalling my macports with: sudo port upgrade --force installed (upgrade all currently installed ports) Will let all concerned know how I go. Ruby 1.9.1 - not for the faint of heart. (I've overcome a few hurdles just to get to this stage lol - all in all a very nice experience when it works though) -Adam On 16/09/2009, at 3:03 PM, Ian Leitch wrote: > I've not been following this thread very closely, but the ruby > version you're building the gem against is 1.8.7, not 1.9.1. > > Wild guess... you're building the gem using sudo, does your root > user have /opt/local/bin in PATH? > > does 'which ruby' and 'sudo which ruby' give you the same result? > > 2009/9/16 Adam Salter <adam.q.sal...@gmail.com> > Firstly, wow cutting edge hardware! > 'arch -x86_75 irb' > ;) > > Second, > Protip: require 'rbconfig' > > >> Config::CONFIG['CFLAGS'] > NameError: uninitialized constant Config > from (irb):1 > from /opt/local/bin/irb:12:in `<main>' > >> require 'config' > LoadError: no such file to load -- config > from (irb):2:in `require' > from (irb):2 > from /opt/local/bin/irb:12:in `<main>' > >> require 'rbconfig' > => true > >> Config::CONFIG['CFLAGS'] > => "-O2 -arch x86_64 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fno-common - > pipe -fno-common" > > It _is_ 64 bit. :/ > > > And third, > It works if i install hpricot from source... > > now i'm getting json gem compiler errors... even after uninstall/ > reinstall > >> /Users/adam/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/json-1.1.9/ext/json/ext/ >> parser.bundle: [BUG] Segmentation fault >> ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [universal-darwin10.0] >> >> Abort trap > > > I think my macports archs might be f#$%ked up somewhere along the > line. > > I was a _early_ snow leopard adopter and a lot changed in the first > few days... > > -Adam > > On 16/09/2009, at 2:35 PM, Bodaniel Jeanes wrote: > >> Nice ... Good tip for me to remember! >> >> >> Config::CONFIG['CFLAGS'] >> => "-arch i386 -arch x86_64 -g -Os -pipe -fno-common - >> DENABLE_DTRACE -fno-common -pipe -fno-common " >> >> Adam, is you see it is compiled as both you can force it to run as >> one or the other by doing: >> >> $ arch -i386 irb >> >> or >> >> $ arch -x86_75 irb >> >> and see if that yields better results (`man arch` for more info) >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Ian Leitch <port...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> ~ $ irb >> irb(main):001:0> Config::CONFIG['CFLAGS'] >> => "-O2 -arch x86_64 -fno-common -pipe -fno-common " >> irb(main):002:0> >> >> 2009/9/16 Bodaniel Jeanes <m...@bjeanes.com> >> >> nevermind, none of those return anything useful for me with regards >> to the architecture. Someone who is more knowledgeable about these >> things could probably find out using something like Array#pack and >> the byte orders etc but this is way beyond my knowledge. If `file` >> says it is 64-bit it's a good bet it is and perhaps you should be >> force-compiling Hpricot as 64-bit instead... >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Bodaniel Jeanes <m...@bjeanes.com> >> wrote: >> Sorry .. what about the following constants: >> >> >> Object.constants.grep /RUBY/ >> => ["RUBY_DESCRIPTION", "RUBY_VERSION", "RUBY_COPYRIGHT", >> "RUBY_FRAMEWORK", "RUBY_RELEASE_DATE", "RUBY_FRAMEWORK_VERSION", >> "RUBY_PLATFORM", "RUBY_PATCHLEVEL"] >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Adam Salter >> <adam.q.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So what version of ruby1.9 do I have? 'i386-darwin10' or 'x86_64' >> >> btw: ruby -e 'puts RUBY_VERSION' >> gives '1.9.1' >> >> -Adam >> >> On 16/09/2009, at 1:34 PM, Lincoln Stoll wrote: >> >>> That's because SL reports the kernel architecture as the platform >>> type, not the userspace architecture. It's been a contentious >>> issue.. But that's another story. >>> >>> Also, by default macports on 64 bit capable systems will build 64 >>> bit binaries. You can change this to build for 32/64 or 32 only by >>> playing with the universal variant. >>> >>> Linc >>> >>> // Sent from my mobile phone. >>> >>> On 16/09/2009, at 3:38, Adam Salter <adam.q.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know what the hell is going on: >>>> >>>> [r...@omegatron ~]# ruby -v >>>> ruby 1.9.1p243 (2009-07-16 revision 24175) [i386-darwin10] >>>> [r...@omegatron ~]# file `which ruby` >>>> /opt/local/bin/ruby: Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64 >>>> >>>> ruby is saying it's 32-bit, file is saying it's 64-bit >>>> >>>> -Adam >>>> >>>> On 15/09/2009, at 8:54 PM, Bodaniel Jeanes wrote: >>>> >>>>> using stock ruby you definitely want to be doing that, he is >>>>> using macports ruby 1.9 which based on his `ruby -v` output is >>>>> 32-bit so he should in fact ensure that he is compiling the >>>>> extensions as 32-bit >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Pat Allan <p...@freelancing-gods.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Not sure if it's relevant, but for Snow Leopard I installed >>>>> mysql, pg >>>>> and do_sqlite3 gems configured for 64bit like so: >>>>> sudo env ARCHFLAGS="-arch x86_64" gem install mysql >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Pat >>>>> >>>>> On 15/09/2009, at 11:04 AM, Bodaniel Jeanes wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > I'm still running 187 but i have 191 installed (from source). >>>>> I just >>>>> > tried installing it and I could use the gem fine. I installed >>>>> like >>>>> > so, just to be sure: >>>>> > >>>>> > $ sudo env ARCHFLAGS="-arch i386" gem install hpricot >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Adam Salter >>>>> > <adam.q.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > Interesting point... >>>>> > Are you running ruby 1.9.1/hpricot 64bit? >>>>> > >>>>> > -Adam >>>>> > >>>>> > On 15/09/2009, at 6:09 PM, Bodaniel Jeanes wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> One thing to consider is that the ruby 1.8.7 that comes with >>>>> 10.6 >>>>> >> is 64-bit but your ruby 1.9 seems to be 32-bit. Possibly the >>>>> gem >>>>> >> install picked up on some incorrect env variables and >>>>> defaulted to >>>>> >> building Hpricot for 64-bit? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Adam Salter >>>>> >> <adam.q.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> Is anybody else seeing a segfault on hpricot on OSX 10.6 and >>>>> Ruby >>>>> >> 1.9.1? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I've installed ruby with MacPorts. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Here's the error: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/hpricot-0.8.1/lib/ >>>>> >>> fast_xs.bundle: [BUG] Segmentation fault >>>>> >>> ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [universal-darwin10.0] >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Abort trap >>>>> >> >>>>> >> ruby -v: >>>>> >> ruby 1.9.1p243 (2009-07-16 revision 24175) [i386-darwin10] >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -Adam >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to rails-oceania@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rails-oceania+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
