Sigh. Yes, I know. But after 20+ years in the IT industry, I have spent far too much time wading through other developer's similar decisions. (And being forced to make similar compromises myself, of course...)
- Korny On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dmytrii Nagirniak <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 November 2010 16:36, Korny Sietsma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ... and what happens in 6 months time, when someone creates a product type >> called "foo" ? >> > > In six months time the application might not exists, be different from what > it is now and the context will be absolutely irrelevant. He needs > the solution for EXISTING problem now, not imaginable one in six months. > > So from this perspective it seems like the solution proposed by Bayan > Khalil is the least friction and easy one. > > Cheers, > Dima. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rails-oceania%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. > -- Kornelis Sietsma korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
