> Really? The use case might not be common but it seems like it should > be easy to design the code so it's supportable. I assume after the > user types something in you'll have that in a variable then execute > the Ajax stuff. Wouldn't it be simple to just short circuit the ajax > call and return the value? Just make it configurable with another > option called "ajax=true" (default mode) .. I'd use that by just > passing in "ajax=false".
Yes, that might be possible. If you can find a clean way to do it then please do submit a patch and I'm sure Thomas will commit it. _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
