In the same order as the article from the link...
Parenizor = Class.create();
Parenizor.prototype =
{
initialize: function(value)
{
this.setValue (value);
},
setValue: function(value)
{
this.value = value;
},
getValue: function()
{
return this.value;
},
_toString: function()
{
return "(" + this.value + ")";
}
};
ZParenizor = Class.create();
ZParenizor.prototype =
{
initialize: function(value)
{
//cache the super class
this.base = new Parenizor(value);
//inherit
Object.extend(this, this.base);
//override
Object.extend(this,
{
_toString: function()
{
if (this.getValue())
return this.base._toString();
return "-0-";
}.bind(this)
});
}
};
alert(new ZParenizor(5)._toString());
alert(new ZParenizor()._toString());
--for Swiss inheritance, just explicitly extend your class with only the methods you want...
ZParenizor = Class.create ();
ZParenizor.prototype =
{
initialize: function(value)
{
};{
var numberValue = new NumberValue(value);
Object.extend(this, {setValue: numberValue.setValue , setRange: numberValue.setRange});
}Object.extend(this, {setValue: numberValue.setValue , setRange: numberValue.setRange});
...the rest of the article is so obviously covered in proto (or already by my code above), it's not worth my going on...
On 6/9/06, Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/9/06, Ryan Gahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> was just pointing out that proto
> does all that stuff
No. Prototype.js actually does far less than the methods described in
Douglas' article, you must have misread it. The current prototype
implementation is at the bottom end of what is possible. And as you
have noticed, the article is five years old.
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
_______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
