I thought it was you who made the changes to the file, so I assumed
you knew all the changes that were made.

I've already merged the changes to my own copy and have things working
fine now, so I currently don't have any problems.  I just assumed the
rest of the changes were supposed to be in scriptaculous along with
bug I was witnessing earlier.

So no worries then.  I'm good to go.

Andrew

On 6/21/06, Sammi Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you can do a diff of those files and post it here that would
really speed things up, I'm currently doing paid work, and have
exams, so don't have much time to work at this, but can try to sort
it out if you do this.

Sammi

On 22/06/2006, at 1:23 PM, Andrew Kaspick wrote:

> If you compare the dragdrop.js file that comes with scriptaculous and
> then the copy at http://sputnik.pl/dev/labs/sortable/js.php?dragdrop,
> the latter has additional code to set onDrop.
>
> On 6/21/06, Sammi Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you mean for sortable trees?
>>
>> How would this behavior work?
>>
>> Maybe you could add support and send me a patch?
>>
>> Sammi
>>
>> On 22/06/2006, at 5:30 AM, Andrew Kaspick wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like onDrop isn't fully supported in dragdrop.js
>> >
>> > The svn repo is missing onDrop functions that can found in your
>> > version of the script from
>> > http://sputnik.pl/dev/labs/sortable/js.php?dragdrop
>> >
>> > Any particular reason for this?
>> >
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> > On 6/21/06, Andrew Kaspick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Great.  Thanks for the fix.
>> >>
>> >> On 6/21/06, Sammi Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Hi, you need to read the wiki, this is a known bug and a mistake
>> >> > Thomas F made when implementing my patch.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://wiki.oriontransfer.co.nz/main/show/SortableTree
>> >> >
>> >> > The latest version in SVN solves this problem, but the
>> modification
>> >> > is small, so you can easily make it yourself to dragdrop.js
>> >> until an
>> >> > official release is made.
>> >> >
>> >> > Sammi
>> >> >
>> >> > On 21/06/2006, at 7:31 PM, Andrew Kaspick wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Hello,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'm having a problem when I set the tree option to true on
>> >> Sortable.
>> >> > > If I set the option to false my remote call works fine, but
>> >> once I set
>> >> > > it to true, I get some weird log errors from Webrick...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > undefined method `update' for "11":String
>> >> > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/
>> >> action_controller/
>> >> > > cgi_ext/cgi_methods.rb:214:in
>> >> > > `build_deep_hash'
>> >> > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/
>> >> action_controller/
>> >> > > cgi_ext/cgi_methods.rb:214:in
>> >> > > `build_deep_hash'
>> >> > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/
>> >> action_controller/
>> >> > > cgi_ext/cgi_methods.rb:54:in
>> >> > > `parse_request_parameters'
>> >> > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/
>> >> action_controller/
>> >> > > cgi_ext/cgi_methods.rb:47:in
>> >> > > `parse_request_parameters'
>> >> > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/
>> >> action_controller/
>> >> > > cgi_process.rb:70:in
>> >> > > `request_parameters'
>> >> > > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/
>> >> action_controller/
>> >> > > request.rb:12:in
>> >> > > `parameters'
>> >> > > ... snipped
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The remote call is failing and nothing is getting to my
>> >> controllers.
>> >> > > Is there a specific format for labeling the id's of my <li>
>> >> tags for
>> >> > > the sortable tree to work?  I'm totally lost as to where  this
>> >> error
>> >> > > is coming from.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Has anybody else seen something similar before?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Andrew
>> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > Rails-spinoffs mailing list
>> >> > > [email protected]
>> >> > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Rails-spinoffs mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Rails-spinoffs mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rails-spinoffs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-spinoffs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs



_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs




_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Reply via email to