On 7/23/06, Andrew Tetlaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The insertion stuff totally makes sense when you think that Proto &
Scripty were build as the visible client layer to Ruby on Rails.

I've always assumed that their approach to AJAX was to return HTML
fragments and insert them into the DOM.  If you look at it that way
all the insertion and script handling within innerHTML all makes
perfect sense.

Why does insertion require construction of a JavaScript object?  That
is a lot of work to perform an operation. The other DOM modifying
operations do not require instantiation.
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs

Reply via email to