On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Adam Salter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ummm, a suggestion without a patch is pretty useless.
> I'm not saying that the suggestion would definately go into the public
> release anyway, but really... if you have something you want to see,
> code it and let the admins decide if they want to implement it.
Jim would probably do a better job of it, but just the same this
should do, in rake.rb:
class Application
# ADD 'rake' to end of list
DEFAULT_RAKEFILES = ['rakefile', 'Rakefile', 'rakefile.rb',
'Rakefile.rb', 'rake'].freeze
def raw_load_rakefile # :nodoc:
here = Dir.pwd
while ! have_rakefile
Dir.chdir("..")
if Dir.pwd == here || options.nosearch
fail "No Rakefile found (looking for: [EMAIL PROTECTED](', ')})"
end
here = Dir.pwd
end
puts "(in #{Dir.pwd})" unless options.silent
$rakefile = @rakefile
# -- NEW CODE
if File.directory?(@rakefile)
options.rakelib |= @rakefile
@rakefile = ''
end
# -- END NEW CODE
load File.expand_path(@rakefile) if @rakefile != ''
options.rakelib.each do |rlib|
Dir["#{rlib}/*.rake"].each do |name| add_import name end
end
load_imports
end
I'm not sure why the possibility for @rakefile == '' even exists, but
I utilized it for my patch. If for some reason that's not appropriate,
then extending the if-clause to include the loading of the rakefile in
an else-clause would suffice.
T.
_______________________________________________
Rake-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rake-devel
