On Jan 11, 2010, at 5:42 PM, James M. Lawrence wrote:
With the new DSL separation, two lines are needed to get the top-level DSL inside a regular ruby program, require 'rake' include Rake::DSL I suggest making this equivalent to require 'rake/dsl' This would not affect the present behavior of require 'rake'.
I have no issue with the basics of this request. We would have to move the guts of the DSL module to a different file (since rake itself requires 'rake/dsl', this would put the DSL commands back at top level).
P.S. I was accepted to the Rake group on pivotal but I didn't see how to create a feature request (or to do anything other than export CSV).
By default, I add all tracker requests as viewers. The other choice, "member", allows complete editing of all the story details. I would really like a "request new feature/report bug" role, but pivotal doesn't seem to support that.
-- -- Jim Weirich -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Rake-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rake-devel
