On 5/19/2010 1:00 PM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
So we're sticking with ruby 1.8 for now. As I said, perhaps drake's
approach will be better for 1.9, I'll try that out sometime.
-heath
I tried drake, and it is promising, since its compute tree model is much
more efficient than the MultiTask model I was using, especially in null
builds (no creating/joining of thousands of threads).
However, it has a bug that prevents me from deploying it in our project;
that bug is it sometimes fails to execute tasks during parallel builds.
I created a simple test case and filed a bug on the drake rubyforge tracker.
-h
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Rake-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rake-devel
