Hi Narayan,
Please do create a jira and submit the patch.
Thanks,
/nandana
On Feb 12, 2008 3:27 PM, Narayan Dhillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't received any comments on this, but I think this is a bug.
>
> org.apache.rampart.builder.BindingBuilder.getSignatureBuider(..) should
> set
> org.apache.ws.security.message.WSSecSignature.useSingleCert to false if
> token type is Constants.WSS_X509_PKI_PATH_V1_TOKEN10 or
> Constants.WSS_X509PKI_PATH_V1_TOKEN11
>
> I will appreciate if Dev team confirms this and then I could supply the
> patch.
>
> Regards, Narayan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Narayan Dhillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 February 2008 09:28
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject: RE: Rampart and X509PKIPathv1 token support?
>
> Any thoughts ??
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Narayan Dhillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 February 2008 18:18
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Rampart and X509PKIPathv1 token support?
>
> Hi devs,
>
> Does Rampart(1.3)/wss4j support X509PKIPathv1 token types?
>
> This type of token is supported by wss4j
> (org.apache.ws.security.message.WSSecSignature.)
>
> Looking at the
> org.apache.rampart.builder.AsymmetricBindingBuilder.getSignatureBuider()
> - WSSecSignature.useSingleCert is never set & it always defaults to
> false, and it always returns single certificate token i.e.
> WssX509V3Token10.
>
> I will appreciate if some one from dev team comments on this.
>
> Regards, Narayan
>
> *****************************************************
> This email is issued by a VocaLink group company. It is confidential and
> intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. You should not disclose
> its contents to any other person. If you are not the addressee (or
> responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), please notify the
> originator immediately by return message and destroy the original message.
> The contents of this email will have no contractual effect unless it is
> otherwise agreed between a specific VocaLink group company and the recipient.
>
> The VocaLink group companies include, among others: VocaLink Limited (Company
> No 06119048, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at
> registered office Drake House, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 1FX. United
> Kingdom, Voca Limited (Company no 1023742, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is
> registered in England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Three
> Rivers Court, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire. WD3 1FX. United
> Kingdom, LINK Interchange Network Limited (Company No 3565766, VAT No. 907
> 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at registered office
> Arundel House, 1 Liverpool Gardens, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1SL and
> VocaLink Holdings Limited (Company No 06119036, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is
> registered in England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Homestead
> Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 1FX. United Kingdom.
>
> The views and opinions expressed in this email may not reflect those of any
> member of the VocaLink group. This message and any attachments have been
> scanned for viruses prior to leaving the VocaLink group network; however,
> VocaLink does not guarantee the security of this message and will not be
> responsible for any damages arising as a result of any virus being passed on
> or arising from any alteration of this message by a third party. The VocaLink
> group may monitor emails sent to and from the VocaLink group network.
>
> This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs.
> *************************************************************
>
--
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Software Engineer
WSO2 inc.
http://nandana83.blogspot.com/
http://nandanasm.wordpress.com/
