Hi Nandana,

Issue appears when I use ADB for binding.
In that case soap message looks like below and then Rampart doesn't sign
anything. 
<soapenv:Body>
     <ns1:Request xmlns:ns1="urn:com.xxx">
             <requestId>testSubmission6</requestId>
     </ns1:Request>
</soapenv:Body>

Regards, Narayan

-----Original Message-----
From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 19 February 2008 06:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Rampart/Axiom Xpath namespace prefix issue

Hi Narayan,
        I think this use case is valid. I tested your scenario and it
worked fine for me. Please let me know if I am deviating from the
scenario you explained.

My assertion :

            <sp:SignedElements
xmlns:sp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy";>
                <sp:XPath
xmlns:ns1="http://InteropBaseAddress/interop";
xmlns:ns2="http://xmlsoap.org/Ping";>/soapenv:Envelope/soapenv:Body/ns1:P
ingResponse/ns2:PingResponse/ns2:scenario</sp:XPath>
            </sp:SignedElements>

SOAP Message :

      <soapenv:Body>
         <PingResponse xmlns="http://InteropBaseAddress/interop";>
            <PingResponse xmlns="http://xmlsoap.org/Ping";>
               <scenario
xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssec
urity-utility-1.0.xsd"
wsu:Id="id-21761424">Scenario5</scenario>
               <origin>WSO2</origin>
               <text>WSO2 - ping</text>
            </PingResponse>
         </PingResponse>
      </soapenv:Body>

the element defined in the signed elements has been successfully signed.

thanks,
/nandana


On 2/19/08, Narayan Dhillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
>
>
> I will appreciate if I could get any help/directions on below issue.
>
>
>
> (1) If in my XPath expression I use namespace prefix as shown in (A)
> below, and my payload shown in (B) doesn't contain any namespace
prefix,
> then Rampart doesn't sign anything because
> RampartUtil.getPartsAndElements() doen't return any signed parts back.
>
> Looking at payload (B) it is still namespace qualified and only
> difference is it doesn't have namespace prefix. Shouldn't that we
> handled?
>
>
>
> (2) Also on service side if I get such a payload sent by client, then
> Rampart will also fail to validate it as it won't be able to find the
> parts and hence won't be able to match them in PolicyResultsValidator.
>
>
>
> Could dev team please post their views on it, so that it could be
> resolved?
>
>
>
> (A) Policy example
>
> <sp:SignedElements>
>
> <sp:XPath xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
> xmlns:ns1="urn:com.xxx">
>
>       //soapenv:Envelope/soapenv:Body/ns1:Request/ns1:requestId
>
>       </sp:XPath>
>
> </sp:SignedElements>
>
>
>
>  (B) Payload eaxmple
>
> <soapenv:Body>
>
> <Request xmlns="urn:com.vocalink:corporateAccess">
>
>                <requestId>test</ns1:requestId>
>
>
>


http://nandana83.blogspot.com/
http://nandanasm.wordpress.com/

*****************************************************
This email is issued by a VocaLink group company. It is confidential and 
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. You should not disclose 
its contents to any other person. If you are not the addressee (or responsible 
for delivery of the message to the addressee), please notify the originator 
immediately by return message and destroy the original message. The contents of 
this email will have no contractual effect unless it is otherwise agreed 
between a specific VocaLink group company and the recipient.
 
The VocaLink group companies include, among others: VocaLink Limited (Company 
No 06119048, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at 
registered office Drake House, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 1FX. United 
Kingdom, Voca Limited (Company no 1023742, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is 
registered in England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Three Rivers 
Court, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire. WD3 1FX. United Kingdom, 
LINK Interchange Network Limited (Company No 3565766, VAT No. 907 9619 87) 
which is registered in England and Wales at registered office Arundel House, 1 
Liverpool Gardens, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1SL and VocaLink Holdings 
Limited (Company No 06119036, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in 
England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Homestead Road, 
Rickmansworth, WD3 1FX. United Kingdom.
 
The views and opinions expressed in this email may not reflect those of any 
member of the VocaLink group. This message and any attachments have been 
scanned for viruses prior to leaving the VocaLink group network; however, 
VocaLink does not guarantee the security of this message and will not be 
responsible for any damages arising as a result of any virus being passed on or 
arising from any alteration of this message by a third party. The VocaLink 
group may monitor emails sent to and from the VocaLink group network.
 
This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs.
*************************************************************

Reply via email to