Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:44:03PM +0000, heasley: > Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:07:02AM +0100, Remko Lodder: > > Hi, > > > > I also have “3.99.99” on the system to compare the output. The regular > > version on the system is 3.6 it seems. > > But, the noklogin works after modifying the u_prompt and p_prompt. When > > running rancid -d -t sros <devicename> > > it wants to execute commands that are not available at all on the Alcatel. > > > > The ones that I use from Burgalio’s : > > > > {'show chassis' => 'ShowChassis'}, > > {'show system' => 'ShowSystem'}, > > {'show module' => 'ShowModule'}, > > {'show stack topology' => 'ShowStackTopolgy'}, > > {'show lanpower 1' => 'ShowLanPower'}, > > {'show lanpower 2' => 'ShowLanPower'}, > > {'show user' => 'ShowUser'}, > > {'ls' => 'GenericParse'}, > > {'ls certified/' => 'GenericParse'}, > > {'ls working/' => 'GenericParse'}, > > {'ls switch/' => 'GenericParse'}, > > {'ls network/' => 'GenericParse'}, > > {'show vlan' => 'ShowVLAN'}, > > {'show interfaces status' => 'ShowInterfaces'}, > > {'show running' => 'ShowConf'}, > > {'show configuration snapshot' => 'ShowConf’}, > > > > which does not match: > > > > xecuting noklogin -t 90 -c"show system information;file type > > bootlog.txt;show redundancy synchronization;show chassis;show chassis > > environment;show chassis power-supply;show chassis power-management;show > > card state;show card detail;show debug;show bof;admin display-config > > index;admin display-config” <devicename> > > > > Do note that it seems that the SROS is on a very different architecture > > based then what my Omniswitches use. So it seems incompatible to start > > with, where the alu* scripts might not entirely work with every command on > > the OS6000 that I have, but most of them are accepted in older (legacy) > > components but also on the newer > > versions. > > testing & dev was done with 7750. I will enquire with my nokia contact > about the omniswitch.
I'm told that these are totally separate from the Nokia systems I know and will never converge. so, they should be handled separately, but I have none to poke for debugging/testing. > > Thanks > > Remko > > > > > On 16 Jan 2019, at 18:39, heasley <h...@shrubbery.net> wrote: > > > > > > Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:02:14PM +0100, Remko Lodder: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> First of all, thank you for Rancid, it’s a great tool to monitor > > >> configuration changes and pushing back changes. > > >> > > >> Having Said that; > > >> > > >> I fetched some alcatel switches which I modified a little to work on > > >> various types . These changes are trivial > > >> changes from upstream so no real changes there actually. > > >> > > >> It seems that most switches work just fine, but that one particular > > >> switch is not able to keep up with the > > >> requests. It seems that this specific switch misses commands (like ls > > >> and show interface status). > > >> If I look back in the raw output it appears to miss characters: > > >> > > >> # how interfaces status > > >> ^ > > >> ERROR: Invalid entry: “how” I suspect that the login script it out of sync (ahead of) the cli. possibly due to incorrectly matching a rogue prompt in some output or banner. > > >> The same goes for ls, where ’s' is the command being send. Or for exit > > >> at the end which is send as “xit”. > > >> > > >> The scripts are from: https://github.com/buraglio/alurancid (Thanks > > >> buraglio) and apart from one switch work > > >> fine it seems. > > >> > > >> Switching from SSH to Telnet does not make a difference. > > >> Does someone have an suggestion on where to look? > > > > > > can you try the sros support that is in rancid 3.8 or the current alpha? > > > _______________________________________________ Rancid-discuss mailing list Rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss