I personally think that implementing a remote copy of the repo with git is a big plus. We're currently using SVN but I'd like to make the move.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM john heasley <h...@shrubbery.net> wrote: > Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 01:20:37PM +0000, Wayne Eisenberg: > > I'm considering changing over to git from svn for my rancid version > control. A brief Google search seems to show that converting from one to > the other is not terribly difficult. (So I don't have to lose my history.) > > > > For those who are using git with rancid, what has the experience been > like? Worth doing? Stay with SVN? Doesn't really matter? > > I use all three - IMO, religion. git is slightly easier to implement a > remote > copy of the repo. both are much faster than cvs. > > _______________________________________________ > Rancid-discuss mailing list > Rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss > -- Ugo Bellavance (u...@lubik.ca)
_______________________________________________ Rancid-discuss mailing list Rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo/rancid-discuss
