http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/the-ideology-of-health-care/

April 2, 2009, *10:46 am* Believing in Treatments That Don’t Work

*As Washington debates health care reform, emergency room physician Dr.
David H. Newman explores how medical ideology often gets in the way of
evidence-based medicine.*

By David H. Newman, M.D.

In the early throes of a heart attack, caused by an abruptly clotted artery,
the stunned heart often beats quickly and forcefully. For decades doctors
have administered “beta-blockers” as a remedy, to reduce consumption of
limited oxygen supplies by calming and slowing the straining heart. Giving
these drugs in the early stages of a heart attack represents elegant medical
ideology.

But it doesn’t work.

Studies show that the early administration of beta-blockers to heart attack
victims does not save lives, and occasionally causes dangerous heart
failure. While two studies support the use of beta-blockers after heart
attack, there are 26 studies that found no survival benefit to administering
beta-blockers early on. Moreover, in 2005, the largest, best study of the
drugs <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16271643> showed that
beta-blockers in the vulnerable, early hours of heart attacks did not save
lives, but did cause a definite increase in heart failure.

Remarkably, the medical community has continued to strongly recommend
immediate beta-blocker treatment. Why? Because according to the theory of
the straining heart, the treatment makes sense. It should work, even though
it doesn’t. Ideology trumps evidence.

The practice of medicine contains countless examples of elegant medical
theories that belie the best available evidence.

   - Recent press reports detailing the dangers of cough syrup for children
   have noted that cough syrup doesn’t work. True: No cough remedies have
   ever been proven better than a
placebo<http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/86/3/170>,
   either for adults or children. Yet their use is common.
   - Patients with ear infections are more likely to be harmed by
   antibiotics than helped. While the pills may cause a small decrease in
   symptoms (for which ear drops work better), the infections typically
   recede within days regardless of
treatment<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14520089>.
   The same is true for
bronchitis,<http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab000245.html>
   sinusitis <http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab000243.html>, and sore
   throats <http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab000023.html>. Unnecessary
   antibiotics are still given to more than one in seven Americans each year
   for these conditions alone, at a cost of more than $2 billion and tens of
   thousands of serious adverse medication effects requiring treatment.
   - Back surgeries to relieve pain are, in the majority of cases, no better
   than nonsurgical
treatment<http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/350/7/722>.
   Yet doctors perform 600,000 of these surgeries each year, at a cost of over
   $20 billion.
   - More than a half million Americans per year undergo arthroscopic
   surgery to correct osteoarthritis of the knee, at a cost of $3 billion.
   Despite this, studies show the surgery to be no better than sham knee
   surgery <http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/347/2/81>, in which
   surgeons “pretend” to do surgery while the patient is under light
   anesthesia. It is also no better than much cheaper, and much less
   invasive, physical
therapy<http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/359/11/1097>
   .

Treatment based on ideology is alluring. Surgeries to repair the knee should
work. A syrup to reduce cough should help. Calming the straining heart
should save lives. But the uncomfortable truth is that many expensive,
invasive interventions are of little or no benefit and cause potentially
uncomfortable, costly, and dangerous side effects and complications.

The critical question that looms for health care reform is whether patients,
doctors and experts are prepared to set aside ideology in the face of data.
Can we abide by the evidence when it tells us that antibiotics don’t clear
ear infections or help strep throats? Can we stop asking for, and writing,
these prescriptions? Can we stop performing, and asking for, knee and back
surgeries? Can we handle what the evidence reveals? Are we ready for the
truth?

The administration’s plan for reform includes identifying health care
measures that work, and those that don’t. To place evidence above ideology,
researchers and analysts must be trained in critical analysis, have no
conflicts of interest and be a diverse group.

Perhaps most importantly, we as doctors and patients must be open to
evidence. Pills and surgery are potent symbols of healing power, but our
faith in these symbols has often blinded us to truths. Somewhere along the
line, theory trumped reality. Administering a medicine or performing a
surgery became more important than its effect.

During the first week of 2009, in what may be a hopeful sign, hospital
administrators around the country received a short, unceremonious e-mail
from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The e-mail explained
that, due to recent evidence, immediate beta-blocker treatment will be
retired as a government indicator of quality care, beginning April 1, 2009.
After years of advocacy that cemented immediate beta-blockers in the
treatment protocols of virtually every hospital in the country, the agency
has demonstrated that minds can be changed.

The much more important question for health care reform is, can ours?

*Dr. Newman is author of “Hippocrates Shadow: Secrets From the House of
Medicine.”*

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
=============================================================== 
UNTUK DIPERHATIKAN, melanggar akan dimoderasi/dibanned:
- Anggota WAJIB mematuhi peraturan serta mengirim biodata! Lihat di: 
http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/web/peraturan-rantaunet
- Tulis Nama, Umur & Lokasi di setiap posting
- Hapus footer & seluruh bagian tdk perlu dalam melakukan reply
- Untuk topik/subjek baru buat email baru, tidak dengan mereply email lama 
- DILARANG: 1. Email attachment, tawarkan disini & kirim melalui jalur pribadi; 
2. Posting email besar dari 200KB; 3. One Liner
=============================================================== 
Berhenti, kirim email kosong ke: rantaunet-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
Daftarkan email anda yg terdaftar disini pada Google Account di: 
https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount?hl=id
Untuk melakukan konfigurasi keanggotaan di:
http://groups.google.com/group/RantauNet/subscribe
===============================================================
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Kirim email ke