sebb wrote: > On 4 September 2011 06:18, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2011-08-30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > >> IMHO our existing site[1] is quite basic and aimed at developers. I > >> suspect work is needed to bring it into line with the new policy on > >> trademarks and branding[2]. I'd to take this opportunity to do a wider > >> refresh. > > > >> I would prefer a user centred top level landing page, pushing > >> developer centred product documentation down to a level. > > > > Sounds fine. But it also likely means it will take longer to make the > > site conform to the branding reqs. > > > > I'm not familiar enough with the mvn site plugin to know how to get > > anything into the footer, but for the rest of the requirements I don't > > think it would take too much effort to just make the necessary > > modifications of adding a few "Apache"s here and "TM"s there. > > We went through this exercise in Commons and HttpComponents. > > This is not easy to do with current Maven, so they both use a > customised Maven skin with an updated VM template that picks up > <custom> elements from site.xml. > > You can use the commons skin (it's generic) in your site.xml > > The commons top-level site.xml is here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/commons-site/trunk/src/site/site.xml > > Should be easy enough to adapt for RAT.
I will try to help with the brand stuff. However i do not use Maven so can only tweak and watch: http://incubator.apache.org/rat/site-publish.html -David
