> We need to coin a name for this, I hereby declare it the CWB-tool ;) ;-)
> Someone should implement undo ;) Great idea! Let's ask for volunteers. > Do we expect a user to enable CWB and then disable it when done? > Wouldn't a user just enable it at first sight, and never touch the > button again? - Which brings us back to the current behavior. The only > feature you would gain by disabling it, would be to avoid the occasional > accidental click - which is a useless feature compared to CWB. That's how some other programs have implemented it. Let's ask a different question: How often do users really need to change the WB manually on every single image? The only need I see for this is concert or theater photography with fast changing lights. For most other situations, either camera WB is good enough, you set the WB to a specific color temperature or you have a series of similar pictures, where you correct WB once and then copy/paste it to other images. So, in my opinion, the CWB-tool should need to be selected by the user the same way as the other tools. Good discussion, BTW :-) Martin _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
