Hi In general the images processed with the new option look quite good. Thanks! I think that the value for WP is a bit too high - burned highlights are probably even worse than underexposed pixels.
On the other hand, I am not really sure that having a combined 'Auto BP/WP' is the right thing. May be seperate options for 'Auto WP or Auto Exposure' and 'Auto BP or Auto Contrast' would be better. This would also simplify the naming. And you might think about offering the user some keyboard shortcuts or buttons to do this - I am no really fond of context menus when working on large numbers of images. Just my 10 cents ... Martin Am 08/15/2007 10:05 PM schrieb Anders Kvist: > Hi guys > > I've committed auto white/black point calculation to trunk. I hope to > get some testing help from you guys :) > > There are 2 values i've been trying to adjust a little, black_threshold > and white_threshold in toolbox.c (line 365 and 366). I'am hoping to find > the magic values that will be good for every image...but it needs > testing to find those... > > My idea about it is that a very few pixels should be underexposed and > some pixels should be allowed to be overexposed. It's just an idea i > have, so i'm open for any suggestions... > > An other thing is the name... check the context menu in curves...any > suggestions are welcome :) > > > /Anders Kvist _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
