Hi, I'll try to answer both of you in one post.
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 11:19 +0000, Edouard Gomez wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:46:27 +0200, Martin Egger wrote: > > As Edouard has provided a patch for this for some time, are there plans > > to implement it? I have used the patched RS for some test the last week > > and the results seem OK to me. > Yep i saw a bunch of commits already in SVN and still no plan to merge > (or refuse) this last patch. I'm using it myself (!). I was especially looking for feedback about the linearity of the curve-widget after your patch, the current curve is "gamma-corrected". But nobody seems to mind - which is good ;) > W/o any comment from main authors, i just gave up improving the curve > tool any further. But if there is a clear decision and direction about > the curve tool, i'm still interested into some more work on it. Don't give up, you're more than welcome. > The only drawback is that i won't be able to do anything during one > month, because i'll be in China w/o any PC around. > > > I think, this would be a very nice addition - esp. if it is trivial to > > implement. > > Indeed, once we have the RGB curves we control all rendering using > curves. Lot of photo effects can only be done through RGB curves: > - dominant color removal > - cross processing > - ... > > > Any plans? > Interested in the answer too :-) I would like to merge the luminosity-patch asap and then move on to discuss future enhancements - one problem at a time. I feel that RGB curves would be a nice addition, but we need some discussion about where to stop adding features - or if we should stop at all. Do we need RGB curves? Do we need ab (Lab) curves? Do we need post-curve histogram as background? ... /abrander _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
