Olli Hänninen wrote:

Hi Anders,

Thank you for your answer.


    Well...first of all, we haven't got any code to read meta from
    .orf files yet - so we cannot read the values for camera
    whitebalance yet. We will take a look at this as in the near future.


Just to get to know the current situation, I'd like to ask is this the case with just few cameras (for example Olympus), or is this the case with the vast majority of cameras? There is an option -w in dcraw that you can use to set camera white balance (if possible). Doesn't this help at all? And one more question: does Rawstudio extract meta data by using dcraw or ExifTool by Phil Harvey (http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/) or by some other means?

This is only a few cameras. We have mainly had our focus on easy wins and Canon and Nikon as they are the mostly used. We do the reading of metadata by ourself, so we'll "just" have to check the dcraw code and create a metadata loader for olympus cameras too.

One thought. Would it be a good or silly idea to add yet another "camera white balance" setting that would use reverse engineering? I mean, all raw-files have embedded thumbnails. We could have a piece of code that analyzes the thumbnail's color properties (i.e. darkest and lightest point for R, G and B) and then sets same values for the raw-photo. In other words, the resulting histogram of the raw-photo would roughly be equal to the thumbnail. This way, we would have at least some kind of camera white balance for all cameras without need to write specific code for each camera model and make. Or would this mean more work than tailoring the code for all cameras?
That was a thought we had when we first started out. But it wasn't that bad to read the camera white balance from metadata when we also needed other metadata from the raw files. We never tried using the procedure you've mentioned, but it could be used as a fallback to cameras that leaves no camera wb in metadata - if they have a thumbnail or embedded jpeg :) One thing i don't really like about it, is that a thumbnail is very much reduced in size and a lot of pixels has been cut away, and could leave us with RGB values thats never gonna match a full size photo and again will leave us with a odd camera wb...


Olli H.
/Anders Kvist



_______________________________________________
Rawstudio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev

Reply via email to