Hi Martin > Well, there's a clear difference in files processed with Rawstudio and > Raw Therapee respectively. Damn, by comparison RS is slow and, at least > the 3.0 alpha, unstable. But then it also seems that RT applies many > more different filters.
Yes - that seems quite nasty. In general the demosaic does a pretty good job, but it does seem to break down on high-detail/aliased areas, when the camera itself does little to prevent aliasing. I have filed a bug a while ago for a better high-quality demosaic routine, which you can follow: http://bugzilla.rawstudio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290 We cannot copy the Rawtherapy demosaic routine due to license issues (GPLv2 vs GPLv3) - but I'd like to re-implement it anyway to see if we can squeeze more speed out of it. > I've uploaded a raw (moire-test.nef) and RT's output > (moire-test-rawtherapee.jpg). I chose this particular picture because > RT's output shows very little moiré while Rawstudio's output has quite a > lot. Thanks - it is always good to have good test images! No test chart can beat real-world examples :) Regards, Klaus Post http://www.klauspost.com _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
