It seems Exif.Image.ProcessingSoftware and Exif.Image.Software are
used the same way by big names such as Adobe and Apple.
And, indeed, some online photo hosting sites only "advertize"
Exif.Image.Software.
I could not resist patching our sources to better promote Rawstudio :-)
PS: my patch is supposed to be applied after the vesionning one, but
they're truely independent if you use VERSION macro instead of
RAWSTUDIO_VERSION.
--
Edouard Gomez
Index: librawstudio/rs-exif.cc
===================================================================
--- librawstudio/rs-exif.cc (révision 3617)
+++ librawstudio/rs-exif.cc (copie de travail)
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@
Exiv2::ExifData *data = (Exiv2::ExifData *) exif_data;
/* Do some advertising while we're at it :) */
- (*data)["Exif.Image.ProcessingSoftware"] = "Rawstudio " VERSION;
+ (*data)["Exif.Image.Software"] = "Rawstudio " RAWSTUDIO_VERSION;
+ (*data)["Exif.Image.ProcessingSoftware"] = "Rawstudio " RAWSTUDIO_VERSION;
/* Delete all tags from tags_to_delete */
while(tags_to_delete[i])
_______________________________________________
Rawstudio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
