I have both UFraw and Rawstudio installed, and I hardly ever use UFraw because 
the workflow sucks. I'm sure there are other factors for those who are more 
expert than me.

> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 23:28 -0400, Linuxguy123 wrote:

>>
>> #1) When an image is selected and placed in the main editing window, it
>> needs a lot of adjustment to get near the final product.   
>>
>> In ufraw one can select between using the camera settings for the
>> parameters or one can save a set of parameters and they get applied to
>> every image that is worked on.  I don't see how to do that with
>> rawstudio and thus the images require a lot of adjustment to get to the
>> final product.
>>
>> Its interesting that the small images in the library view bar have
>> pretty good image parameters and are much closer to the final product
>> and thus would be a good starting point for displaying the image in the
>> main editing window.
>>
>> #2) The image adjuster sliders are quite coarse and finicky at least on


I agree.... .a numeric box would give much finer control if needed. Mostly it 
works for me but sometimes I like to be fussy and the slider isn't sensitive 
enough.


>> #3) I need a white balance spot selector.  Ufraw has a good whitebalance
>> spot selector whereby one can select a spot as gray and then use it to
>> adjust the white balance for the rest of the image.  I often shoot gray
>> cards and use them to calibrate the white balance on my images.  I find
>> that this single adjustment can make the most incredible difference on
>> an otherwise correctly adjusted image.

I thought you could already do that just by clicking on an appropriate part of 
the image. To revert to the camera's white balance, you just press "C" on the 
keyboard.



> I also have been used to using the 'eye-dropper' to achieve a color
> correction ( although I do not usually shoot with a gray card) ..
> however I am now finding that simply using the warm/cool slider so that
> the red and blue histograms are matched closely provides a very fast
> alternative that suits me even more. The histogram in RS is a real
> winner.

That trick with the histogram is really interesting .. I didn't notice that 
before... well done. If any one else has any good ideas, please let us know!!!

_______________________________________________
Rawstudio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users

Reply via email to