Message: 5 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:39:12 +0200 From: Gianluca Sforna <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Rawstudio-users] Raw Studio - CentOS 5.5 To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:07 PM, R A Jon Hamelin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have been using RawStudio on a Fedora 13 test box. I use CentOS 5.5 > > for my production OS, but cannot locate a compiled package for CentOS. > > Is there a package available for CentOS or do I have to compile one. If > > it is the latter, I have not had much luck in this area. > Hi, I am the maintaner for rawstudio rpm in Fedora. >From a quick attempt at rebuilding the Fedora package with CentOS+EPEL repositories, I gathered there are missing requirements An useful approach would be to report bugs for each missing requirement in EPEL 5 -right now, the list looks like including just lcms, flickcurl, and lensfun- from: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/<packagename> after those are built, it should be easy to build rawstudio for CentOS. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu Hi Gianluca I found all but lensfun-. I ran ./config on the rawstudio source files. Here are the results: [r...@hg050 rawstudio-1.2]# ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking for library containing strerror... none required checking for gcc... (cached) gcc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3 checking for gcc... (cached) gcc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3 checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for jpeg_destroy_decompress in -ljpeg... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking for jpeglib.h... yes checking for TIFFOpen in -ltiff... no configure: error: *** Rawstudio requires libtiff.Ayum info I have libtiff 3.8.2-7.el5_5.5 i386 and .x86_64 installed but it is still being asked for. Does it require a newer version? The version in F13 is 3.94-1 fc13. Cannot locate lensfun- at all, but it didn't ask for it either. Which package should I file a bug on -- libtiff or rawstudio? Thanks for your assistance, Jon _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-users mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users
